By-Lakhwinder Jhaj–
Abbotsford-
Community organizers recruit, volunteer, and fund—but remain largely behind the scenes, leaving candidates unaware of their true influence.
As the British Columbia Conservative Party leadership race reaches its final stages, a striking pattern has emerged: South Asian community leaders, historically central to political mobilization, remain largely invisible. Reports indicate a surge in party membership from South Asian supporters, yet many of the familiar faces who have driven these efforts are largely behind the scenes, without the recognition they have received in past campaigns.
South Asians in BC have a long and documented history of political engagement. BC has high voter turnout and active volunteering in ridings with significant South Asian populations, including Surrey, Abbotsford, Okanagan, and parts of Metro Vancouver. Community members have organized membership drives, coordinated campaign events, and contributed financially to candidates across party lines. In previous elections, their work was recognized publicly, reinforcing continued involvement and influence.
Demographically, South Asians are among the fastest-growing communities in the province. In past provincial elections, ridings with high South Asian populations have often recorded above-average voter turnout, and surveys indicate strong participation in campaign volunteering and fundraising. In federal and municipal elections, South Asian voters have been decisive in several closely contested ridings.
This time, however, the scenario is different. Many of the South Asian organizers who helped recruit new members were unaware that these efforts would not translate into visibility or acknowledgment in the leadership race. Instead of being seen as central participants, they remain largely “in the closet,” their contributions quietly underpinning party growth. The party’s newly implemented, more tedious membership verification system further complicates matters. Members recruited en masse may face hurdles to voting, and those who brought them in may feel unmotivated to shepherd them through verification, reducing the potential influence of a community that has historically been a powerful political force.
A simple metaphor illustrates the current situation: if a candidate cannot see someone sitting quietly in the room, will they notice them when standing and active? South Asian organizers have historically stood up—mobilizing communities, volunteering hours, and funding campaigns—yet their presence is often only visible when explicitly acknowledged. With decades of contributions across politics, business, health care, education, and culture, it raises a question: why should the South Asian community have to be begged for recognition when their efforts have been consistently substantial and impactful?
The effect on the leadership race could be significant. While one candidate will inevitably win, the South Asian community’s engagement—or lack of it—could influence which candidate emerges victorious. In a tight race, even small differences in verified membership participation could shift the outcome. Candidates who fail to recognize the organizational networks, volunteer energy, and financial contributions of South Asian supporters risk misjudging a key segment of the electorate.
Historically, South Asian organizers have been instrumental in moving campaigns and elections. Their ability to mobilize volunteers, drive voter registration, and coordinate local campaigns has had measurable effects on provincial elections. Without recognition and meaningful engagement, there is a risk these leaders may begin to feel used, sidelined, or “not good enough to be stood by,” despite having done the heavy lifting of recruitment and groundwork.
The situation raises broader questions about political engagement and inclusion. Membership numbers alone are not sufficient; recognition, visibility, and empowerment are essential for sustained participation. Organizers who feel overlooked may disengage, leaving the party with the challenge of converting numbers into active, motivated voters.
As the leadership race concludes, the winner will be determined, but the path to victory could be reshaped by South Asian participation. Their historically proven capacity to mobilize resources and votes means candidates who fail to engage meaningfully may underestimate the importance of this community. Recognizing and including them could be decisive—not just for the leadership outcome, but for the party’s ability to compete effectively in the next provincial election.
The question remains: is it too late for candidates to act if they truly care about engaging these communities? Even at this stage, meaningful acknowledgment, outreach, and support could influence participation and leave a lasting impression for future elections. Whether candidates seize this opportunity—or let the moment pass—may shape not only the leadership race but also the party’s credibility and momentum in the years to come.
This is my opinion only.
Lakhwinder Jhaj
